Monday, February 22, 2016

CONTACT NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION (NNPC)

NNPC
Corporate Headquarters 

NNPC Towers, Central Business District, 
Herbert Macaulay Way, 
P.M.B. 190, Garki, Abuja.
E-mail: contactus@nnpcgroup.com

COMPANY OVERVIEW

The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is the state oil corporation which was established on April 1, 1977. In addition to its exploration activities, the Corporation was given powers and operational interests in refining, petrochemicals and products transportation as well as marketing. Between 1978 and 1989, NNPC constructed refineries in Warri, Kaduna and Port Harcourt and took over the 35,000-barrel Shell Refinery established in Port Harcourt in 1965.



In 1988, the NNPC was commercialised into 12 strategic business units, covering the entire spectrum of oil industry operations: exploration and production, gas development, refining, distribution, petrochemicals, engineering, and commercial investments. Currently, the subsidiary companies include:
  • Nigerian Petroleum Development Company (NPDC)
  • The Nigerian Gas Company (NGC)
  • The Products and Pipelines Marketing Company (PPMC)
  • Integrated Data Services Limited (IDSL)
  • National Engineering and Technical Company Limited (NETCO)
  • Hydrocarbon Services Nigeria Limited (HYSON)
  • Warri Refinery and Petrochemical Co. Limited (WRPC)
  • Kaduna Refinery and Petrochemical Co. Limited (KRPC)
  • Port Harcourt Refining Co. Limited (PHRC)
  • NNPC Retail
  • Duke Oil

In addition to these subsidiaries, the industry is also regulated by the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), a department within the Ministry of Petroleum Resources. The DPR ensures compliance with industry regulations; processes applications for licenses, leases and permits, establishes and enforces environmental regulations. The DPR, and NAPIMS, play a very crucial role in the day to day activities throughout the industry

CONTACT EXXON MOBIL NIGERIA

ExxonMobil Logo
1, Lekki Expressway,
Victoria IslandLagos
Nigeria
Building Name: Exxon Mobil House
Head Quarter / Branch : Headquarter
Tel 1: +234-1-262-1640
Website: www.exxonmobil.com 
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Mobil Producing Nigeria began operations in Nigeria in 1955 under the name Mobil Exploration Nigeria Incorporated and was incorporated as Mobil Producing Nigeria on June 16, 1969. Production of crude oil began in February 1970 from the Idoho field, located off the coast of Akwa Ibom State.

Mobil Producing Nigeria is the operator of the joint venture with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation and holds a 40% participating interest. MPN is the only major oil company operating completely offshore; with no onshore production. The company holds over 800,000 acres in shallow water offshore southeastern Nigeria. Production comes from 90 offshore platforms, with 283 flowing completions in 353 wells with a production capacity of about 720,000 barrels of crude, condensate and natural gas liquid (NGL) a day. Of the current total liquid production, 94 kbd is condensate from the OSO field, which is exempt from OPEC quota restrictions. MPN also produces 45 kbd of NGL at the OSO NGL platform under a separate agreement, where it holds a 51% interest in partnership with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation.

The East Area Project is designed to gather gas from all MPN fields, compress, extract NGL and inject lean gas for additional recovery of about 800 MOEB.

The Yoho Field Development Project is a shallow water development of Yoho and Awawa reservoirs to recover about 400 MBO at a production rate of 150 KBD.

ExxonMobil also has a production sharing contract with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation in the development of the Erha major deepwater oil and gas discovery (ExxonMobil interest 56.25%). Field development will be via subsea wells flowing into a floating production, storage and offloading system. Bonga will also include a Floating Production, Storage and Offloading vessel with subsea producers and injector in 3,300 feet of water. Target production is 200,000 barrels of oil and 150 million cubic feet of natural gas a day. ExxonMobil has equity share of 20% in Bonga field operated by Shell.

In January 2002, ExxonMobil announced a 20% working interest Bolia; a significant deepwater oil discovery offshore Nigeria.

Esso Exploration and Production Nigeria Limited (EEPNL)

Esso Exploration and Production Nigeria Limited (EEPNL) was established in 1993 as an affiliate of the Exxon Corporation.

EEPNL and other Esso subsidiaries hold interests in six deepwater blocks covering 3.2 million acres, which gives them the second largest deepwater offshore acreage position in Nigeria.

The Company is the operator of the Erha project. This is a deepwater license (3400 feet) and the location of a major oil and gas discovery. Erha's target production rate is 150 kbd and it is expected to produce about 500 million barrels of the oil (gross). Start-up is scheduled for 2005. EEPNL has a 56% interest in the Erha project. The remaining 44 percent is held by Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company (SNEPCO). Commercialization of gas resources holds promise, utilizing proprietary ExxonMobil technology.

EEPN (Deepwater) Limited has a 20% participating interest in the Bonga project. This project is located in 3300 feet of water and is operated by SNEPCO. Bonga has a target production rate of 200 kbd of liquids and 150 mcfd of gas and is expected to produce about 560 million oil-equivalent barrels (gross). A second successful discovery called Bonga Southwest was made in January 2001. In January 2002, the company announced another significant deepwater oil discovery called Bolia. Esso has a 20% interest in this SNEPCO-operated block.

EEPN (Benue) Limited has a 47.5% interest in the Chota project; operated by Conoco. In May 2002, the company announced a deepwater oil discovery, Usan and EEPNL (Offshore East) Limited has a 30% interest in this block, which is operated by TotalFinaElf.

Mobil Oil Nigeria plc (MON)

Mobil Oil Nigeria began operations selling Sunflower kerosene in 1907 as Socony Vacuum Oil Company.

The company changed its name to Mobil Oil Nigeria Limited and became a limited liability company in December 1951. In 1991 it became a publicly traded company known as Mobil Oil Nigeria plc.

CONTACT CHEVRON NIGERIA

Chevron Hallmark - Human Energy

Chevron Nigeria Limited

2 Chevron Drive, Lekki Peninsula
Private Mail Bag 12825
Lagos, Nigeria
Telephone: +23.4.1.277.2222

COMPANY OVERVIEW
Chevron is one of the world's leading integrated energy companies. Our success is driven by our people and their commitment to get results the right way—by operating responsibly, executing with excellence, applying innovative technologies and capturing new opportunities for profitable growth. We are involved in virtually every facet of the energy industry. We explore for, produce and transport crude oil and natural gas; refine, market and distribute transportation fuels and lubricants; manufacture and sell petrochemical products; generate power and produce geothermal energy; invest in profitable renewable energy and energy efficiency solutions; and develop the energy resources of the future, including researching advanced biofuels.

Company Roots

We trace our beginnings to an 1876 oil discovery at Pico Canyon, north of Los Angeles, which led to the formation of the Pacific Coast Oil Co. That company later became Standard Oil Co. of California and, subsequently, Chevron. We took on the name Chevron when we acquired Gulf Oil Corporation in 1984, which nearly doubled our worldwide proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. At the time, our merger with Gulf was the largest in U.S. history.
Another part of our history is The Texas Fuel Company, formed in Beaumont, Texas, in 1901. It later became known as The Texas Company and, eventually, Texaco. In 2001, our two companies merged.
The acquisition of Unocal Corporation in 2005 strengthened Chevron's position as an energy industry leader, increasing our crude oil and natural gas assets around the world.

Global Scope

Our diverse and highly skilled global workforce consists of approximately 64,700 employees, including more than 3,200 service station employees.
In 2014, Chevron's average net production was 2.571 million oil-equivalent barrels per day. About 74 percent of that production occurred outside the United States. Chevron had a global refining capacity of 1.9 million barrels of oil per day at the end of 2014.
Our marketing network supports retail outlets on five continents.

Technology and Emerging Energy

We focus on technologies that improve our ability to find, develop and produce crude oil and natural gas from conventional and unconventional resources.
We also invest in the development of emerging energy technologies, such as finding better ways to make nonfood-based biofuels, piloting advanced solar technology for our operations and expanding our renewable energy resources.

Environment and Safety

As a company and as individuals, we take great pride in contributing to the communities where we live and work.
We also care about the environment and are proud of the many ways in which our employees work to safeguard it.
Our persistent efforts to improve on our safe work environment continue to pay off. In 2014, we achieved strong safety results, including record lows in the days-away-from-work rate, the total recordable incident rate, loss of containment incidents and spill volumes.

CONTACT SHELL NIGERIA

Go to www.shell.com

Contact Details

ABUJA

Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd.
Plot 461, Constitution Avenue
Central Business District
Abuja.
Nigeria
Tel:  +234 (0) 8070260165 
       +234 (0) 8070260134

PORT-HARCOURT

Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd.
P.O.Box 263
Shell Industrial Area
Rumuobiakani
Port Harcourt
Nigeria

COMMUNITY CONTACT

Telephone: + 234 (0) 807 02 28197

LAGOS

Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd.
Freeman House
21/22 Marina
PMB 2418
Lagos
Nigeria
Tel: +234 (0) 8070269999

WARRI

Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd.
P.O.Box 230
Warri
Nigeria

Shell Nigeria Gas Limited


COMPANY OVERVIEW

Shell has been active in Nigeria since 1937.  Shell companies and investments have played a pioneering role in onshore, shallow and deep water oil exploration and production. Shell has also been at the forefront of gas development, producing and delivering gas to domestic consumers and export markets for over 40 years.
Our values
Our core values of honesty, integrity and respect for people form the basis of the Shell General Business Principles.
Our business activities in Nigeria
  • The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC) is the largest Shell company in Nigeria and produced the country’s first commercial oil exports in 1958. SPDC is the operator of a joint venture (the SPDC JV) between the government-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation – NNPC (55% share), SPDC (30%), Total E&P Nigeria Ltd (10%) and the ENI subsidiary Agip Oil Company Limited (5%). It is focused on onshore and shallow water oil and gas production in the Niger Delta. 
  • Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company (SNEPCO) operates the Bonga field, Nigeria’s first deepwater oil discovery. The Bonga facility has the capacity to produce more than 200,000 barrels per day of oil and 150 MM standard cubic feet of gas per day.
  • Shell Nigeria Gas (SNG) is the only international oil and gas company to set up a gas distribution company in Nigeria to supply industry customers.
  • Nigeria LNG (NLNG) is a joint venture incorporated in 1989 to produce LNG and natural gas liquids for export. It was Nigeria’s first LNG project. Shell holds a 25.6% share, together with NNPC (49%), Total (15%) and ENI (10.4%).
Shell In Nigeria by numbers
  • The SPDC JV’s assets include around 50 producing oil fields, a network of approximately 5,000 kilometers of oil and gas pipelines and flowlines, five gas plants and two major oil export terminals (Bonny and Forcados)
  • Bonga was Nigeria’s first oil and gas project in water depths over 1,000 metres. It increased Nigeria’s oil capacity by 10% when it began producing in 2005 and  has production capacity of 200,000 barrels of oil per day and 150 million standard cubic feet of gas per day
  • The NLNG plant at Bonny Island has six processing units (trains) with total processing capacity of 22 million tonnes a year of LNG and up to 5 million tonnes of natural gas liquids (LPG and condensate). NLNG accounts for approximately 7% of the world’s total LNG supply
Our contribution
Shell Companies in Nigeria (SCiN) are major contributors to the economy, not only through the energy they produce and the revenues they generate for the country, but also via their supply chains, local content and social investment.
In 2014 Shell-operated ventures in Nigeria produced an average of 739,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d), with 578,000 boe/d from the Shell Petroleum Development Company Joint Venture (SPDC JV) and 161,000 from the Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company (SNEPCo). Shell Nigeria Gas (SNG) supplies natural gas to 85 industrial customers and the SPDC JV is the major supplier of gas to Nigeria LNG. SPDC’s Afam VI power plant supplied approximately 18% of the nation’s grid-connected electricity in 2014.
Nigeria depends on the oil and gas industry for approximately 90% of export income and 75% of overall government revenue.
SCiN make a major contribution to developing the country’s human capital and contracting capacity. 90% of SCiN contracts were awarded to Nigerian companies in 2014.
SCiN pursue a variety of social investment projects, with a particular focus on community and enterprise development, education and health. Nigeria the largest concentration of social investment spending in the Shell Group.
  • In 2014 Shell-operated ventures contributed $202 million (Shell share $93.6 million) to the NDDC as required by law
  • $112 million (Shell share $34 million) was directly invested by the SPDC JV and SNEPCo in social investment projects
Collectively, this makes Nigeria the largest concentration of social investment spending in the Shell Group.

CONTACT DANGOTE GROUP

Dangote Group

Dangote Group
Union Marble House
1 Alfred Rewane Road,
Ikoyi
Lagos, Nigeria.

E-mail: communications@dangote.com


Company Overview
The Dangote Group is one of the most diversified business conglomerates in Africa with a hard-earned reputation for excellent business practices and products' quality with its operational headquarters in the bustling metropolis of Lagos, Nigeria in West Africa.

The Group's activities encompass:
 Cement - Manufacturing / Importing
 Sugar - Manufacturing & Refining
 Salt - Refining
 Flour & Semolina - Milling
 Pasta - Manufacturing
 Noodles - Manufacturing
 Poly Products - Manufacturing
 Logistics - Port Management and Haulage
 Real Estate
 Dangote Foundation
Since inception, the Group has experienced phenomenal growth on account of quality of its goods and services, its focus on cost leadership and efficiency of its human capital. Today, Dangote Group is a multi-billion Naira company poised to reach new heights, in every endeavour competing with itself to better the past.

The Group's core business focus is to provide local, value added products and services that meet the 'basic needs' of the populace. Through the construction and operation of large scale manufacturing facilities in Nigeria and across Africa, the Group is focused on building local manufacturing capacity to generate employment and provide goods for the people.

FORMATION, VALIDITY AND ENFORCEMENT OF ONLINE AND ELECTRONIC CONTRACTS IN NIGERIA


Introduction 
The Internet revolution has created an electronic platform for local and international online electronic communication, socialization, transactions, marketing, shopping, research, education, entertainment, banking, payment of bills and provision of services as well as the formation of the electronic contracts governing them. 
In this piece, we shall consider the formation, validity and enforcement of electronic contracts with attention on Nigeria.
Legal Framework 
It is trite that treaties and international conventions on electronic contracts are not enforceable in Nigeria, until domesticated by legislation. Apart from passing into law the National Information Technology Development Agency Act, 2010 and the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.,) Act, 2015, to provide the legal framework for combating prohibition, prevention, detection, response, investigation and prosecution of cyber crimes; and for other related matters,a number of draft bills meant to regulate electronic transactions,contracts and infrastructures in Nigeria are pending before the National Assembly of Nigeria.
The paucity of statutory framework regulating electronic transactions and contracts in Nigeria does not render electronic contracts invalid or unenforceable in Nigeria. The Evidence Act, Cap. E14, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, recognizes electronic documentary evidence as proof of electronic transactions and the use of electronic signature for the authentication of electronic contracts. Moreover, the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, prevention, etc.) Act, 2015 though, a criminal legislation provides that, electronic signature in respect of purchases of goods, and any other transactions are binding. 
A. Electronic Documents 
1. What is an Electronic Document? 
The Evidence Act defines a "computer" to mean any device for storing and processing information, while a "document" includes any device by means of which information is recorded, stored or retrievable, including computer output. From the foregoing definition of a computer and a document, an electronic document is a document generated in a computer for the entering or the processing of information, which may be stored in or retrieved from the computer. 
B. Electronic Contract 
1. What is an Electronic Contract? 
An electronic contract is piece of information, communications, or correspondences in an electronic document, creating obligations between two or more correspondents that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law. 
2. Formation of Electronic Contract 
Traditionally, a contract may be made or entered orally or in writing or implied from the conduct of the parties.The advent of electronic documents as additional means of entering into a contract other than a paper document, has not changed the basic requirements for the formation of a valid and enforceable contract. 
It has however, added to the variant of a written agreement, thereby giving the parties intending to enter into a written agreement or contract the option of having it on the traditional paper document or in a dematerialised format of an electronic document.Whichever means a contract is entered or formed, the law recognizes five vital ingredients as the constituent of a valid and enforceable contract. 
These are offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity to contract and intention to create legal relationship. See: College of Medicine V. Adegbite (1973) 3 SC. 149; Nimanteks Associates V. Marco Const. Co. Ltd. (1991) 2 NWLR (Pt. 174) 411 at 427, per Tobi JCA (as he then was). 
Thus,before there can be said to be the formation of an electronic contract between the correspondents, it must be apparent or implicative that, there was an offer and an acceptance backed by consideration with the intention to create a legal relationship between the correspondents who possessed/possess the capacity to enter into such a contract. 
The determination of the date, time and place when an electronic document or piece of information is sent or received is crucial in the determination of the formation of an electronic contract. 
3. The Nature of Electronic Contract 
Electronic contracts are entered or made not just via electronic mails or correspondences, but also by electronic communications on electronic platforms such as online instant messaging applications, in the likes of WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Blackberry Messenger or any kind of electronic communication platform, facility or device that has the capacity for the exchange of electronic information. 
It also includes automated contracts after filling electronic forms or by touching a digital button on a computer or an electronic device screen or by speaking to a device or by clicking on digital or electronic buttons or icons on pages of blogs ,website or any electronic devices which notifies or indicates that by clicking the button or by electronically ticking an inbox or by texting a code to your electronic communication service provider you automatically agree to be bound by the terms and conditions put forward by your service provider as terms and conditions that shall govern the electronic transaction you are about to transact online. 
It is our view that, electronic contracts are not and should not be limited to only online or cyber communications, but also an exchange of electronic telecommunication text messages, having all the elements of a valid and enforceable contract. Likewise,virtual agreements or agreements not made online but, in a dematerialised electronic format, stored in an electronic device, having all the elements of a valid and enforceable contract. 
C. Electronic Signature 
1. What is an Electronic Signature 
A signature is any name, mark or writing used with the intention of authenticating a document. Most persons are comfortable with traditional contracts because of the security and familiarity with paper documents and handwritten signatures. An electronic signature, also called a digital signature is a secure, digital code attached to an electronically transmitted message that uniquely identifies and authenticates the sender.
It is interesting to note that, a signature that has been prepared and reproduced by mechanical or photographic means or a signature on a document transmitted by a facsimile machine are not classified as digital signature. See Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition at page 1387. The classification of digital signatures should include signatures made with electronic or digital pens and biometrics. 
2. The Nature of Electronic Signatures 
An electronic signature is a computer-generated signature by way of encryption. Encryption is the process of encoding messages or information in such a way that only authorized parties can access it. It is a computer security process by which the content of a message or file is scrambled using an encryption algorithm to generate cipher text which, can only be read by someone who has the right encryption key to translate it to the original plain text. 
Encryption involves the use of two different translation keys namely: public and private keys. Each signatory possesses a private and public key pair, one key encrypts the information and another, mathematically related key decrypts it. The computer sending an encrypted message uses a chosen private key that is never shared and so is known only to the sender. In order to have an electronically signed document the following will apply:
a. A sender must first create a public-private key pair before an electronic communication can be digitally signed.
b. The private key is kept confidential by the sender and is used for the purpose of creating a digital signature. 
c. A hash function is used in the signature generation process to obtain a condensed version of the data to be signed; the condensed version of the data is often called a message digest. The message digest is input to the digital signature algorithm to generate the digital signature. 
d. The sender attaches the digital signature to the communication and sends both electronically to the intended recipient. The sender discloses his or her public key to the recipient. 
e. When the digitally signed communication is received the recipient's computer runs a computer program containing the same cryptographic mathematical formula that the sender used to create the digital signature. The digital signature is automatically decrypted using the sender's public key. 
f. If the recipient's program is able to decrypt the digital signature successfully, he or she knows that the communication came from the purported sender. 
g. If a communication has been altered or tampered with because the recipient's program will create a second message digest of the communication. This second message digest is then compared to the original message digest. If the two match the recipient has now verified the integrity of the message. 
It is important to emphasize that, the security of this format of electronic or digital signature system is dependent on maintaining the secrecy of the signatory’s private keys. 
3. Certification Authority
The issue of the security of Web server used as the medium of electronic exchange of sensitive security data is an issue that calls for attention. In some jurisdictions, this has been sorted out with the use of third parties to verify an individual's public key. Such a third party is called a certification authority, who acts as a middleman that both parties or computers trust. The Certification Authority confirms that each computer is in fact who it says it is, and then provides the public keys of each computer to the other. 
4. The Legal Effect of Electronic or Digital Signatures 
The effect of electronic or digital signature in the formation of electronic contracts includes: 
a. Authentication and Verification - Authentication and verification of the integrity of electronic document or data and the identity of the signatory. Only a sender's public key will decrypt an electronic signature encrypted with the sender's private key. 
b. Non-repudiation - Prevent repudiation by the sender later once the authenticity and integrity of a communication have been established. The recipient of a signed electronic document can use it electronic or a digital signature as evidence in demonstrating to a third party that the signature was actually generated by the claimed signatory. 
c. Meets Statutory Requirement - Electronic document and signature satisfies the requirement by statutes such as the Statute of Frauds that some types of contracts must be in writing and signed by the parties. 
5. The Use of Electronic Signature in Nigeria 
a. Statutory Requirement 
In Nigerian jurisprudence of evidence, an unsigned document upon which a claim or defence is founded is taken as a worthless and inadmissible evidence of such a claim. Even if it is admitted in evidence, the court would not attach any probative value to it. This is because a document which is not signed has no origin in terms of its maker. See Omega Bank (Nig.) Plc V. O.B.C. Ltd (2005) 8 NWLR (Pt.928) 547 at 581 paragraph D, per Tobi JSC. 
Although, a number of draft bills meant to regulate electronic transactions and contracts in Nigeria are yet to be passed into law, the Evidence Act recognizes the use of electronic or digital signature for the authentication of electronic contracts in contracts where a rule of evidence requires a signature or provides for certain consequences if a document is not signed.
Similarly, the Evidence Act permits that, all electronic signatures may be proved in any manner, including by showing that a procedure existed by which it is necessary for a person, in order to proceed further with a transaction to have executed a symbol or security procedure for the purpose of verifying that an electronic record is that of the person. 
We are of the view that, except in contracts where signatures are statutorily required to validate the contract, an electronic or digital signature is not necessary to validate an electronic contract in the manner the manual signature validates the contract expressed on paper. What is of legal consequence is the evidence in the electronic correspondences or dialogue between the parties that, there was an offer and acceptance backed by consideration with the intention to create legal relationship between the electronic correspondents who possessed or possess the capacity to enter into such a contract. 
Likewise, the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, prevention, etc.) Act, 2015 though a criminal legislation provides that, electronic signature in respect of purchases of goods, and any other transactions are binding and whenever the genuineness or otherwise of such signatures is in question, the burden of proof, that the signature does not belong to the purported originator of such electronic signatures shall be on the contender. Any person who with the intent to defraud and or misrepresent, forges through electronic devices another person’s signature or company mandate commits an offence and shall be liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of not more than 7 years or a fine of not more than N10,000,000.00 or to both fine and imprisonment. 
Under the Cyber Crimes Act, the following transactions are excluded from the categories of contractual transactions or declarations that are valid by virtue of electronic signature: 
(a) Creation and execution of wills, codicils and or other testamentary documents; 
(b) Death certificate; 
(c) Birth certificate; 
(d) Matters of family law such as marriage, divorce, adoption and other related issues; 
(e) issuance of court orders, notices, official court documents such as affidavit, pleadings, motions and other related judicial documents and instruments; 
(f) Any cancellation or termination of utility services; 
(g) Any instrument required to accompany any transportation or handling of dangerous materials either solid or liquid in nature; 
(h) Any document ordering withdrawal of drugs, chemicals and any other material either on the ground that such items are fake, dangerous to the people or the environment or expired by any authority empowered to issue orders for withdrawal of such items. 
b. Certification Authority
There are no such infrastructure yet in Nigeria like in some jurisdictions, where several national companies serve in this capacity for individuals and organizations for a nominal fee. 
It is legally reasonable to conclude that, the non-existence of Certification Authorities in Nigeria as at the date of writing this article, can be attributed to non-existence of a statutory legal framework for such Authorities. 
D. Enforcement of Electronic Contract 
1. Several Electronic Correspondences 
It does not matter that an electronic contract involves several electronic correspondences or communication as it settled position of law that, in the interpretation of a contract involving several documents, the document must be read together as one. C.B.N. V. Igwillo (2007) ALL FWLR (Pt. 379) SC. 1385 at 1413, Paras. B-C. 
2. Breach of Electronic Contract: 
A breach of contract is committed when a party to a contract, without lawful excuse fails, neglects or refuses to perform an obligation he undertook in the contract or either performs the obligation defectively or incapacitates himself from performing the contract or by wrongfully repudiating the contract. Kemtas Nig. Ltd. v. Fab Anieh Nig. Ltd. (2007) ALL FWLR (Pt. 384) 320 at 342 Paras. B - C (CA). 
3. Consequences of Breach of an Electronic Contract 
It must be borne in mind that the simple operation of contract is that where parties voluntarily agree to do an act and one of the parties neglected or defaulted from carrying out or doing what was agreed to be done, then there is a breach of that contract by the party who neglected or defaulted in performing his or her own side of the contract and the person responsible for the breach of the contract will be liable in damages to the other party. Obimiami Brick & Stone (Nig.) Ltd. V. African Continental Bank Limited (1992) LPELR-SC.186/1990, Per Babalakin, J.S.C. (Pp. 93-94, paras. E-G), 
4. Material Evidence of Electronic Contract 
In the event of dispute on the contract or a breach of the electronic agreement, the computer printout of the content of the electronic or virtual contract entered in the cyberspace or stored in an electronic device can be tendered in court or in any alternative dispute resolution forum as prove of the agreement between the parties. 
In Nigeria Evidence Act, 2011 signed into Law in July 2011 provides for the admissibility of computer-generated evidence stored on computer, electronic devices, media and platforms. 
5. Forum for the Dispute Resolution of Electronic Contracts 
One of the legal issues in an electronic contract, even paper contract is the forum or jurisdiction, where dispute resolution will take place in the event of dispute. In Nigeria, in the absence of a dispute resolution forum clause all suits for the specific performance, or upon the breach of any contract, may be commenced and determined in the Judicial Division in which such contract ought to have been performed or in which the Defendant resides or carries on business. 
6. Choice of Laws 
Where there is no choice of governing law clause in a contract, whether an electronic or a paper contract and where the governing law cannot be implied; then the proper law of the contract would be applied. The proper law of a contract is simply the law of the place or jurisdiction with which the contract bears the closest relation. The factors usually taken into account include: 
a. The place of contracting 
b. The place of negotiation of the contract 
c. The place of performance 
d. The location of the subject matter of the contract 
e. The domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties 
7. Likely Dispute Issues in the Enforcement of Electronic Contracts: 
The following peculiar issues may crop up in the enforcement of an electronic contract: 
1. Negligence or carelessness with passwords or access codes thereby enabling an impostor to use an electronic platform to defraud an unsuspecting correspondent. 
2. Repudiate the electronic contract or denying liability on the ground that, an impostor entered the contract. 
3. Not verifying the other party's identity before making commitments. 
4. The sender proving the receipt of an electronic correspondence where the other party denies receipt. 
5. The sender claiming the electronic correspondence received by the receipt is different from the one sent by he or she. 
6. Hackers accessing, stealing, manipulating and corrupting electronic documents. 
7. The statutory legal framework specifically regulating electronic transactions and contracts in Nigeria. 
8. Electronic viruses corrupting a file and rendering it inaccessible. 
9. Alteration of sent messages saved in sent box and inbox and deleting of emails. 
10. Convergence of digital devices e.g. phone, camera, email, etc. 
11. The statutory requirement for some contracts to be signed by the parties. 
12. Limitation electronic data storage capacity. 
13. Web security. 
14. Failure to exercise due diligence. 
15. Determination of the date, time and place when an electronic document or piece of information is sent or received. 
E. Due Diligence 
It is necessary for parties to an electronic contract to exercise due diligence to establish who they are dealing with online. A person who is negligent or careless with his or her passwords or access codes thereby enabling an impostor to use his or her an electronic platform to defraud an unsuspecting correspondent may not be able to avoid liability especially with the development an electronic or digital signature which verifies the source of an online correspondence. 
F. Conclusion 
The value of reliability placed on electronic correspondence in Nigeria is very low, as many users of electronic platform including some lawyers are either not aware that, electronic contracts can be implied or made from mere electronic correspondences without signatures or are wary of entering into a contract without a direct face to face communication. The latter may be due to the online fraudulent activities of internet fraudsters or due to ignorance of the fact that, transacting business on electronic platforms is cost effective and time saving compare to than traditional paper platforms. 
The absence of a statutory legal framework on electronic transactions in Nigeria is enough to invoke doubts on the validity of the contract. Fortunately, however, the provisions of the Evidence Act, 2011 on electronic evidence (Section 84) provides the necessary legal protection for the enforcement of electronic contract in Nigeria. Moreover, it is not the doubting or the believing of the validity of a contract that makes it valid or invalid in law, but the presence of the basic ingredients of a valid contract in the contract in issue, be it a paper or an electronic contract. 
It is pertinent for person or organisation about to accept an electronic offer or sign a contract-agreement on paper, is to seek for a good Lawyer to review the electronic offer or contract, before electronically accepting the offer or before appending your signature. 

     Uche Merife, LL.B, B.L 

Friday, February 19, 2016

ADMISSIBILITY OF STATEMENTS IN DOCUMENTS PRODUCED FROM COMPUTERS

1.0        INTRODUCTION:

One of the new provisions included in the Evidence Act of 2011 to update the law of evidence in Nigeria to the twenty-first century and bring it to terms with the computer generation is Section 84 and 258 (1) of the Act. These sections define what a “computer” is in the jurisprudence of evidence and expanded the scope of the definition of a document.

2.0        DEFINITION OF A COMPUTER:

Section 258 (1) of the Evidence Act, 2011, defines a computer as:

“any device for storing and processing information, and any reference to information being derived from other information is a reference to its being derived from it by calculation, comparison or any other process;”


3.0        DEFINITION OF A DOCUMENT:

Section 258 (1) of the Act, expanded the scope of the definition of a document to include:

(a)    books, maps, plans, graphs, drawings, photographs, and also includes any matter expressed or described upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks or by more than one of these means, intended to be used or which may be used for the purpose of recording that matter;

(b)    any disc, tape, sound track or other device in which sounds or other data (not being visual images) are embodied so as to be capable (with or without the aid of some other equipment) of being reproduced from it, and

(c)     any filmnegative, tape or other device in which one or more visual images are embodied so as to be capable (with or without the aid of some other equipment) of being reproduced from it; and

(d)    any device by means of which information is recorded, stored or
retrievable including computer output:

Similarly, Section 258 (1) of the Evidence Act, 2011, unlike the old Act defines a "Copy of a Document" to include:

(a)     in the case of a document falling within paragraph (b) but not (c) of the definition of "document" in this subsection, a transcript of the sounds or other data embodied in it;

(b)     in the case of a document falling within paragraph (b) but not (c) of that definition, a reproduction or still reproduction of the image or images embodied in it whether enlarged or not;

(c)     in the case of a document falling within both those paragraphs, such a transcript together with such a still reproduction; and

(d)     in the case of a document not falling within the said paragraph (c) of which a visual image is embodied in a document falling within that paragraph, a reproduction of that image, whether enlarged on not, and any reference to a copy of the material part of a document shall be construed accordingly;


4.0        ADMISSIBILITY OF A STATEMENT CONTAINED IN A DOCUMENT PRODUCED BY A COMPUTER:

Section 84 expressly permits the admissibility of a statement contained in a document produced by a computer once the four conditions precedent for it admissibility stated in Section 84 (2) of the Evidence Act of 2011 are met.

These four conditions precedent are:

(a)      that the document containing the statement was produced by the computer during a period over which the computer was used regularly to store or process information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period, whether for profit or not, by anybody, whether corporate or not, or by any individual;

(b)      that over that period there was regularly supplied to the computer in the ordinary course of those activities information of the kind contained in the statement or of the kind from which the information so contained is derived;

(c)      that throughout the material part of that period the computer was operating properly or, if not, that in any respect in which it was not operating properly or was out of operation during that part of that period was not such as to affect the production of the document or the accuracy of its contents; and

(d)      that the information contained in the statement reproduces or is derived from information supplied to the computer in the ordinary course of those activities.

These four conditions precedent for admissibility of a statement contained in a document produced by a computer were considered by the Supreme Court in the recent case of   Dr. Imoro Kubor & Anor. V. Hon Seriake Henry Dickson & Ors. (2012) LPELR-SC.369/2012, where the eminent jurist, Onnoghen, J.S.C  expounded  that, the above conditions precedent were the pre-conditions laid down by the law  and consequently,  held that, the  two computer generated documents in issue were not admissible in evidence on the ground that, the said four conditions precedent were not satisfied by the Appellant.

Be that as it may, Section 84 (4) of the Act provides that:

“    In any proceeding where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate —

(a) identifying the document containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;

(b) giving such particulars of any deviceinvolved in the production of that document as may be appropriate  for the purpose of showing that the document was produced by a computer.

(i)  dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in subsection (2) above relate, and purporting to be signed by a person occupying a responsible position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the management of the relevant activities, as the case may be, shall be evidence of the matter stated in the certificate; and for the purpose of this subsection it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.”

In the case of Kubor & Anor. V. Dickson & Ors. (supra) the issue of the certificate stated in Section 84 (4) was not an issue rather His Lordship referred to the failure of the Appellant to lay the  necessary foundation for the admission of  e-documents under Section 84 of the Evidence Act .

5.0        CONCLUSION:

It is submitted that, in the absence of the certificate referred to in Section 84(4), if a witness is a person occupying a responsible position in relation to the operation of the computer by which a document was generated such a witness may be led in evidence to lay the necessary foundation of the particulars required to be in the certificate.


(SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE)

IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA
IN THE LAGOS JUDICIAL DIVISION
HOLDEN AT LAGOS
                                               
                                                                                           SUIT NO: FHC/L/_______

BETWEEN:

1. MR GABRIEL LAWAL                                      PLAINTIFF             
                       
 AND
                                                                                                         
DANA AIRLINES LIMITED                                   DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 84 (4) OF THE EVIDENCE ACT, 2011

I, Uche Stanley Merife, of Suites 201 – 203 West Wing, City Hall, Catholic Mission Street, Lagos, do hereby certify that the underlisted documents were published on the official website of the Accident Investigation Bureau (www.aib.gov.ng/publication.php) and printed from a HP 600B series Desktop computer, with Serial No: TRF2370S71, which is used in our office at Suites 201 – 203 West Wing, City Hall, Catholic Mission Street, Lagos, regularly to store and process information and is in good working condition:
      i.        A copy of the Updated Report on Dana Air 0992, 5N-RAM Crash of 03/06/2012 in Lagos, published 5th September, 2012.
    ii.        A copy of AIB Interim Statement on Dana Air 0992 of 03/06/2012, published on 3rd June, 2013.
The printed documents, which were compared to the copies in the above mentioned Desktop computer, are the same.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,


Uche Stanley Merife